In article BoJ@netcom.com, shf@netcom.com (Stuart Ferguson) writes:
>+-- stranahan@aol.com (Stranahan) writes:
>| We aren't in habit of pulling features for no good reason - but Stuart is
>| the authority on this, it's never even occured to me to ask. I can't see
>| why we would.
>
>Yes, I'm the authority. I'm the god; I'M THE GOD!
>
>Sorry.
>
>I've always wanted to have a rexx or rexx-like scripting capability on
>all platforms. There are literally hundreds of macros available
>commercially for LightWave, and I had no desire to leave these companies
>in the lurch when we went multi-platform. There were several
>possiblities for interpreters we could have used in 4.0, and they all
>failed to do what we needed. So I designed the current scripting
>system to work as a plug-in allowing either someone else or us to write
>an interpreter plug-in later. This will happen, one way or another.
>
>This is my story and I'm sticking to it. Someone PLEASE put this in
>a FAQ so I don't have to keep answering the same question over and over.
>Thanks.
>--
> Stuart Ferguson (shf@netcom.com)
> "How do you compute that? Where on the
> graph do `must' and `cannot' meet?"
If someone puts all these together or if there's a newsgroup archive I'll gladly put a few choice items online in the tomahawk mosaic site. Mbe even put up a gopher.
